Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Tech Field Day’

Symantec Backup Exec Brings Backup down to 1U

August 15th, 2011 Comments off

Because backing up data is something that goes without question. Sure care should be taken to select the right software and media to ensure your (or your organization’s) data is regularly backed up.  Imagine if there was a single solution allowing easy management and usage.

Symantec Backup Exec Appliance

Symantec Backup Exec is coming to a new single U / single SKU appliance that will manage your backups and restores.

The Symantec Backup Exec v3600 is designed to take the management pain out of backing up data.  By including all of the agent licenses for Windows and Exchange and SQL (among others) there is no guessing and ordering to ensure that the correct licensing exists.  The goal of the device is to simply do backups and restores after a little configuration.

Configuration

Getting the appliance up and running requires knowledge of your network and an available IP address for the device.  It does need to be on the same subnet as the other devices (the remote agents) that you will be backing up.  Once this is configured, build your backup jobs and get them scheduled.

Storage

This appliance will manage 5.5 TB of backup deduplicated data, which for many SMB organizations is plenty of storage space. Because the data is deduped the storage space is increased even further. The disk based nature of the appliance makes for improved backup and recovery speed. But be aware that in the first implementation there is no tape support. Backup data can be migrated to a USB drive or replicated to other Symantec Backup Exec appliances, the cloud through a few different hosts, or a USB drive.

The backup data will be deduplicated before it heads off to the cloud, based on the cost of bandwidth to get data onto a cloud service, this is kind of a big deal.  For an extremely small organization the cloud might be a good off-site option, but for many I feel that even deduped data will be to expensive to send there.  The inclusion of a cloud option may be a great decision going forward when cloud services get cheap enough to allow this type of thing.

Simple and all inclusive backup and easy restores appears to be the goal, but there are some caveats there as well.

Also, you cannot use SAN storage for backups from the device.  Once the internal storage is full, that’s all she wrote.  Adding the ability to use existing SAN storage once the internal storage gets to a certain percentage (say 80%) would be a huge step forward.  Personally, I think that the backup jobs should be flushed to an archive regularly enough where rolling over-writes (similar to recycling tapes) can happen to reuse space for more recent backup data.  If it is important for posterity, archiving is the way to go.

Not expandable

The v3600 is not expandable.  The out-of-box configuration is as good as it gets, which is a little dissapointing given that the appliance is so straightforward.  While looking at the demo of this applicance, I also came across a Dell offering powered by Backup Exec that seemed a bit larger than the v3600.

Tape Support

I know that many organizations are moving (or have moved) away from tape and even many who attended Tech Field Day with me were quite vocal about getting away from tape, but what about as an archival solution?

While I also know that backup is not a legitimate archival solution, bringing some archival to the appliance, to allow for backups to have a scheduled archival from the v3600 to a tape library or drive for easy off site archival of data would be a great addition to this already interesting appliance.

Central Administration… not included

For those of you using many Symantec Backup Exec media servers and central administration to manage all of these, this license is not included with the v3600 and will need to be purchased separately.  Might still be worth considering if there are going to be other media servers within your environment.

I would like to see a slimmed down version of the CA server on the appliance so that it can be the one stop shop and manage all of your other media servers (if any).  Maybe the device detects other Symantec Backup Exec servers in an environment and prompts to enable the central administration features if needed.

How does dedupe happen?

Looking back at deduplication which is a nice feature given the finite amount of storage included, the process for dedupe is to point the backup jobs needing to be deduplicated at a predetermined folder on the device.  When jobs use this folder, the data will be deduplicated.  Thats a pretty cool idea.  The use case I can think of for this would be an mailbox backup job.  Duplicate messages would be taken care of automatically.  Hopefully when used with email or other common sources of duplicate files, the rehydration of restored data is optional or at least configurable to allow dupes to be skipped going back to Exchange.

Support and Maintenance

There will be 1 year and 3 year options for support available as a separate purchase.  At first I wasn’t sure this would work, having the support separate, but thinking about it further it makes sense to allow support to be optional.  This way it can be used when needed.  Suppose you have the appliance for a few years with a support contract, if other things come up and the solution no longer fits or will be used only for a certain situation, the support can be changed to a lesser plan (if you have the 3 year option) or discontinued as needed.

Final Thoughts

I am definitely interested in seeing pricing and a bit more about the Symantec Backup Exec appliance.  When that happens I will consider it to possibly become a part of disaster recovery planning.  I do not think at this time it will completely replace the media server we have today, but when my organization goes virtual the data portion, file servers and things that users cannot live without might be great candidates for an all in one appliance.  I will definitely keep it in mind.

TechFieldDay here I come

August 8th, 2011 1 comment

I head to Austin Tx for Tech Field Day 7 on Wednesday morning. Should be a good couple days of sessions and overall discussion. I am not sure at the moment who I am most looking forward to. I think all of the presenters have things that interest me.

The Presenters are:

Dell (Dell | @Dell_Storage)

SolarWinds (SolarWinds | @SolarWinds_Inc)

Symantec (Symantec | @Symantec)

Veeam (Veeam | @Veeam)

Some of them I have seen before, but there are new product releases since then and probably some new faces as well. I think the networking opportunity is what I like the best about Tech Field Day. In my neck of the weeds… er woods there aren’t many user groups so these events and the online stuff that tends to go with them are high on my list. Although the local tech stuff may be changing soon, but I cannot divulge that just yet.

I am looking forward to seeing some old friends again and definitely making some new ones. These events are busy, but in my past experiences they are enjoyable.

A bit of a thank you in advance to Stephen, Matt, and the rest of the TechFieldDay crew, without them, we wouldn’t be doing this. Oh and for the links above, I apologize as the editor I can access right now doesn’t seem to HTML friendly – will fix those soon. Update: Links Fixed… much better.

Tech Field Day::Avere Systems

November 22nd, 2010 Comments off

Another of the companies that presented at Tech Field Day was Avere Systems, a startup from Pittsburgh focussing on optimized storage tiering.  After spending a good chunk of time with NetApp, another approach to storage was somewhat refreshing.  Avere uses an appliance to handle the storage tiering and optimization before the data is stored.  If you don’t write the extra bits to a disk, there is no dedupe or manage extra data.

Tiering or Caching… that appears to be one of the questions

Some storage vendors use a flash cache (which should be spelled flache cache in the spirit of things, but oh well) to ensure that performance and decent (or blazingly fast) IOps occur.  This approach is fine because hot, or frequently accessed, data is kept in the cache for speedier access.

Other strategies involve tiering, or storing less needed data on slower and cheaper disks while keeping the hot and very active data on solid state disks or other much faster disks to allow for fast access to these items.  I am not sure which approach is best (or nearest perfect) because it seems each method has an issue the other one claims to solve.  The Great Taste/Less Filling approach to storage if you will.

If a cache made of primarily SSD media allows data that is frequently accessed to be stored in a way that makes access to it much faster than other, less frequently accessed data, someone (or some algorithm) has to be able to decide by some reasonable method which data is “hot”.

On the other hand, a tiered system uses algorithms to decide which data is hot and which data is cold also, but moves this data between tiers of spindle/disk types as it becomes more frequently used.

Where does Avere fit into this picture?

Right out front.  Avere provides an appliance that makes the tiering decisions for the stored data before it ever gets stored, then writes it to the disk.  When the information is needed, the appliance gets the information and caches a copy of the data to ensure immediate response and delivery to the users or machines needing the data.

This is a benefit because the appliance out front is handling the caching and tiering, keeping the cost of the mass storage down and allowing great response times when reading and writing information.

More than just storage aiding devices

When I watched the presentation that Ron gave at Tech Field Day, I was quite impressed with his enthusiasm for the things his company is working on.  Explaining why storage is constantly growing and the disk performance is not keeping up with the needs of organizations was a particularly interesting portion of this presentation.  Because disk speeds (in IOPS) arent keeping up with user requirements (or organizational requirements) of immediate data access, IT departments would typically have to throw more disks at the problem to improve performance.  This happens because the more spindles you have available to handle your data, the better performance you can achieve.

Many storage vendors sell more disks to improve the performance of storage, but because Avere uses an appliance containing its own file system and decide which data should be sent to which section (or tier) the storage array simply serves up disk for the Avere appliance to send data toward.  This allows the back end storage to be commodity, moderate performance spindles which come at a cheaper price.

When a user requests a file, the Avere appliance caches a copy of that file pulled from the storage array and serves it to the user.  Multiple requests are served from the front end and the information is only written back to storage on an as needed, but regular basis.

If there are multiple locations, additional appliances can be added to improve the performance for the users against stored data and to allow items to be striped across multiple avere appliances, improving failover for the users as well as overall performance.

Scaling… does it scale?

The Avere approach scales in both directions (out and up) because you can add more spindles to provide storage depth in addition to adding more avere appliances to scale out and provide breadth of storage and greater accessibility and speed of access to users across your environment.

I am certainly interested in testing this appliance in a real environment and will be working with Avere to see if this is possible.  Because storage is coming soon to my organization, it might be a great time to do some testing (and of course more blogging and digging into how things work where allowed).

TechFieldDay Pre Session:: Xangati

November 19th, 2010 1 comment

I received an email to participate in a session just ahead of Tech Field Day from the team at Xangati.  The premise was a quick meet and greet and an overview of the product.  I am guessing they were hoping to access the Tech Field Day Delegates without the Tech Field Day price tag.  I saw the demo and talked with them and really like what they had to say, but would have rather seen them as part of Tech Field Day.

The product that was demonstrated looked really cool for those in a VMware environment and should be a very useful tool, but the approach to accessing the delegates was a bit weak.  Bringing some engineers to a conference room as part of Tech Field Day would have been a better approach for several reasons:

1. A larger audience – they would have been able to talk to and get feedback from a larger group

2. continued feedback – being able to work with the delegates after Tech Field Day for continued feedback and suggestions

3. A more favorable view – lets face it, access to the delegates without being a sponsor of Tech Field Day is iffy at best

Done with the overhead

Ok, now that I have made my point about sponsoring Tech Field Day, I will look briefly at their product.  The remainder of the post will be brief and related to what was presented.

The idea behind Xangati is to help VMware administrators see more of what is actually going on in their VM environments.  Revealing access to bottlenecks and traffic flow between VMs, host machines, and the virtual (and physical) networks.  Oddly, this is functionality that isnt available within VMware’s client applications.  Sure you can see CPU and Memory and general information, but not packets and other network related information.

A couple of features that caught my attention

Have you ever wanted to review what might have happened without sifting through tons of log file information when troubleshooting a problem?  With Xangati, you can.  They record activity based on triggers or conditions and allow you to log into their interface and play back what happened.  This feature was pretty slick during the demo as it allows the administrator to see what happened and from there drill into the details of certain traffic or issues seen in the recording.

Another related feature is the User facing help desk feature which allows users to complete a form containing their name and a description of the problem.  When they send it to the help desk, a recording is triggered for a default of 15 minutes which allows the IT staff on the other end to get a look at traffic and other data generated by this host.  That is pretty sweet.

I did ask if they might be able to integrate features like the Problem Steps Recorder (even through and API call) to capture what the user might be doing when they call to tell you the Internet is down and there was no official comment there.  Just a thought or a might be nice idea is all I was hoping to pass along.

Interesting product… needs more exposure

With the usefulness of this tool, it seems odd that I (and others) had never heard of Xangati before.  Sure they go to big trade shows, but many times I don’t.  Once Tech Field Day got going there was lots of video and even a live stream (see below) which provided anyone an opportunity to check out the sponsor companies and what they have to offer.  The price of admission for Tech Field Day sponsors has to be well worth it.

I hope Xangati takes this feedback and decides to appear at future Tech Field Day events.  I look forward to seeing them there.

Back in the AITP

November 17th, 2010 Comments off

Ok so it sounded much more iconic when the Beatles were going through my head this morning. Thanks Apple, but Im not sure that was as huge as you think it was.  I have joined the Association of Information Technology Professionals (again).  I am curious to see if the experience is better this time around.  Sure high level conversations are ok, but how long can that stuff keep up.

Maybe it hit me this week because I just got back from Tech Field Day and the great presentations and companies and new friends there have changed my expectations a bit.  I am working on a list of companies that I plan to submit to the Northeast Wisconsin chapter of AITP to see if they might be willing to come speak at one of the meetings.  I know the hotel has a bar and that this is also a networking event, but from the meetings I have been to, there are quite a few cliques and not nearly enough geek speak.

Ways to improve

Bring more technical speakers to the stage and allow us to jump in with questions or throw water bottles when the presenter mentions a research company that did an independent study (remember, Im just back from Tech Field Day… and I think that happend once).

Skip the Q&A and dive right in.  If Im to hold my questions until the end, this means I need to take notes.  Since not very many people bring any gear into these events, that isnt likely to happen.

Bring in smaller and innovative companies.  Don’t get me wrong, I like Microsoft too, and have friends that work there, but when does Microsoft bring a huge pile of innovation to your meetings?  Maybe get some big product demos like Lync or work more closely with members and perhaps local DPEs from Microsoft to build better presentations for the attendees.

Companies like Avere Systems, SolarWinds, and Actifio have great products and hugely innovative ideas.  I am hoping to work with the organization to contact them about presenting.

Purpose

The purpose is to bring IT Pros together to network and learn things.. hopefully new and exciting things.  I am looking forward to this year in the club, but will reserve judgement on renewal until the end of the year to see how it goes.

A Disclosure Post for Tech Field Day

November 14th, 2010 Comments off

While attending Tech Field Day San Jose this week the TFD staff hosted a round robin give away for the attendees of the event.  I was definitely on the lucky end of all the awesome prizes given away and left the opening dinner with a new iPad.  It was a giveaway item and in no way influences my blogging, unless the wordpress client for iPad gets better, then it might be come a viable tool for use on the blog.

I also received some swag from sponsor companies, including stickers (used to decorate the previously mentioned iPad), t-shirts, and a flash drive.  The products these companies produce stand on their own and the swag will have no influence on any posting I do about these products.  They will sink or swim on their own.

I wanted to ensure that I got some disclosure out for things received at Tech Field Day and thank all of the parties involved for putting on such a great event.

I would also like to thank Brandon Carroll for aiding me in loading up both my credit card and my iPad ;)

Categories: Technet Tags: , ,

Tech Field Day 4 – San Jose

September 29th, 2010 Comments off

Just this morning I received an email containing an invitation to Tech Field Day 4 in San Jose California from November 10 – 12.  I am jazzed about this for two three reasons that come to mind right now:

1. Stephen and Claire throw a great un-conference and there is always a lot to learn

2. I have never had the chance to visit San Jose

3. The Tech Field Day experience is fantastic.

Disclosure

Tech Field Day is an event put on by Gestalt IT and is all expenses paid for delegates like myself.  There will be blogging opportunities for the delegates to discuss the products/vendors we meet and learn about and there may be additional give away items from sponsor companies.  These items will in no way influence the tone of any blogging done regularly on this site or any blogging done in covering Tech Field Day events.

End Disclosure

So for those who haven’t heard of TFD, here is some brief information about what goes on.

Delegates are chosen to attend the event which is sponsored by several companies (at this time the sponsors cannot be disclosed).  The sponsor companies present to the delegates about their companies, products, and other things.  We as delegates and technology professionals are able to ask questions and discuss with these organizations concerns we may have and generally blog about or podcast about the event.

I sort of think of this as a press day for the technology pros who use the products and interact with the companies.

I am very excited to be a part of another Tech Field Day.

A summary of Tech Field Day Seattle

July 19th, 2010 Comments off

The last few days were insanely busy, with sessions and discussion and emerging new standards, but all in all Tech Field Day Seattle was an amazing experience.  I took a pile of notes, though there could have been more and met a group of great people who I would likely not have been able to meet otherwise.  We heard from several companies and got great information about using new ideas and products and spent a lunch hour discussing the effectiveness of a new standard in networking communication #FCoTR (Fibre Channel over Token Ring).

This post is an overall view of what I got out of #Techfieldday, which was quite a lot.

What’s this all about?

As in a previous post, Tech Field Day is a summit of technical thinkers and organizations who can benefit from the feedback each has to give.  I realize that the sponsor companies were looking for product feedback and constructive discussion which they got, but I think the delegates were able to learn a great deal as well, both about the hot new products coming from the sponsor companies and about technology in general.

I know I got a lot out of the networking opportunity with everyone and that was very valuable for me.

Getting into the discussion

We heard from 5 companies at Tech Field Day Seattle this week and the theme was definitely storage.  The companies that came out were:

Tech Field Day Seattle Sponsor Companies

Virtualization of both systems and storage were hot topics this week and rightfully so.  Since big storage allows a huge amount of virtualization possibilities the two go hand in hand.

Working to provide feedback to these organizations as well as have some open discussion about our opinions of the product was the overall goal of the sessions.  To be honest and open and not solely “for the press” by giving the presenters honest feedback and not worrying about media image, but of technical relevancy was a nice change.

A bit about the companies we saw

First up was Veeam.  Its always good to go first, sets the tone for the rest of the day.



The Veeam crew provided information about their Virtualization solutions providing backup and replication of virtual machines.  The seemingly easy to use process of being able to get your VM Snapshots replicated to a DR environment.  Being new to the Virtualization space (and wishing spell check would be OK with the word Virtualization) I can see the usefulness of a tool that takes the guesswork out of ensuring your VM environment is both backed up and safe somewhere else in the environment.

But some would say…

Snapshots are not backup.  Which they arent, technically.  However if there are enough snapshots taken regularly, there is no reason that this could not be almost a complete replacement for actual backup.  Depending on the size of the environment and resources available.

My organization is just now looking into Virtualization and this solution could be a great supplement to existing backup methods once we get there.  Perhaps to keep the VMs in a mount-ready state at another site and back them up with our current solution.

Next up was Nimble Storage.  They built an array that uses both flash based storage and more affordable storage to provide a high-speed read/write solution and manage it all from one interface and in one box.

This was a highlight for me.  Not only because I am interested in and learning about storage arrays but because the company launched at Tech Field Day.  They have been working on development of the product and with customers, but chose this event to go live.

Bringing to market a storage solution is one thing, but to deliver a product that can accomodate what appear to me to be the pitfals of typical storage, fast reads and lower cost long term storage could be huge.

Most companies like cheap storage… cheap is relative of course, but being able to put data on SATA disks can save quite a bit of money in overall solution costs.  They are cheap and they work great for read operations.  So with SATA disk you get great storage and read access, but the writes can be a bit slow.  Depending on the environment and the number of drives in the solution (and number of hits by users) the reads may also be slow, but many times not deal-breaking.

Along with the afford-ability of backend storage, Nimble Storage combines high performance writes to the array in the form of a flash cache.  On the front of the storage system there is a flash based cache that allows nearly instantaneous access to storage (both for read and write).  Data goes into the cache and is written to storage or disk at intervals.  So if there is a file that gets written into the cache and is highly used it may not get written until much later in the day making it instantly available within the flash disk for your users.

I think of it as a tiered approach (although it is not quite the same as other tiered solutions we saw, more there in a bit) where information goes into the flash based portion of the solution on write and stays there until the cache gets to a certain percent full, then is written to the disk.  Once the cache is written to disk portions of it can be cleared to make room for other data.

Tiered storage isn’t new

I know there are other organizations that use tiering to keep heavily accessed stuff highly available to the users, which is a great concept, but the heavy incorporation of a set of SSD media to improve overall performance (especially writes to the array) is great.

After lunch on day one, we took a break from the Storage/Backup stuff for a while and went over to F5 networks for a session.

F5 was new to me.  I had seen their building before on other visits to Seattle, but wasn’t really sure what they were all about.  What I learned was networks were the business they were in but it wasnt necessarily pointing users or companies at the Internet (or network), it was more about providing an experience on the network for the users that was optimized in many ways.

The F5 core product is a device called Big IP which proxies connections to resources and can optimize the availability or access to these resources for the user needing them.  This was very cool.

An example would be a website that lives on servers spread across multiple locations.  The Big IP can optimize the use of these resources by doing things like figuring out which web server is closest to the requester and routing the request to that server to display the content.  Doing this creates better resource distribution for the servers and a much faster/smoother experience for the user.

Another concept that was introduced to me while at F5 (aside from the awesome cupcakes) was their technologies of iRules and iControl and the community they have put together to help provide and support these technologies.

iRules are the items that move things around.  They allow you to apply scripts to traffic that hits the Big IP device and take action on it.  Like the delivery of content from a server near you as discussed in the above example or working around an error found on a web page.  Suppose my website was sitting behind a Big IP device and I discovered that a string entered in browser when looking for certain content allowed pages to be manipulated by users.  iRules could be created to inspect the traffic as it was coming through the Big IP and based on the rule send the visitor to a predetermined place instead of the area where the manipulation might happen.  This effectively works around the issue.

iControl allows applications on a network to work together even on dissimilar environments.  Traffic monitoring and business process management come to mind for me here.  Suppose you wanted to monitor traffic coming into your network across all locations. iControl would be able to provide a simple interface across all of these devices to allow for monitoring rather than having to capture all the data at each location and work with it separately.

Tech Field Day – Day 2

On day two we were able to board the bus a bit later, which was great.  First on day 2 was Compellent for a session about their storage technology.

Compellent produces storage arrays that support automatic tiering of data across multiple types of disks.  This is really pretty sweet.  The automatic tiering idea is one that takes a look at the data being stored and scrubs it for statistics every day.  With the information it discovers during scrubbing the algorithm used within the array can determine how much use their is on a file (or group of files) and move limited use data to a higher tier of storage, or one that isnt as frequently used.

Perhaps your production database is kept in tier 1 to allow for fastest access, but some of your company’s marketing material is not accessed all that much and can be kept on tier 3 storage costing less money long term.

Why do I care about where items live?

If an item is used infrequently it can live on inexpensive (and slower) storage media.  Perhaps things that are not used often will live on SATA drives within the array and things used every day will live on faster SAS drives.  This could be done by administrators, moving things around to optimize their use, but Compellent takes care of this and does it all within the same array.

Another area where I found Compellent to be particularly impressive was in replication. With Compellent arrays on both ends of a DR solution, replication between these arrays can be done at a much faster rate because the information can be compressed and only the changes replicated rather than the entire file during certain time periods.  This can speed up performance and optimize bandwidth when needed by users.

During the intermission…

During the intermission of lunch and blogging at TFD day 2 a great deal of discussion was had covering a new networking standard Fibre Channel over Token Ring.  You can read more about that here.  We also made a trip to building 92 at Microsoft to check out the company store and more of their campus.

Back to Storage

Our last presentation was at NEC North America and covered their HYDRAStor product.

When I got to NEC I had no idea they were in the storage business.  I have used NEC projectors and things but this was completely surprising to me.  Not only was the product new to me (and most apparently) but our host Gideon Senderov was a wealth of knowledge on the product.  It was by far the presentation that captured my attention the most.

The HYDRAStore product is built on NEC gear (Servers… who knew NEC made servers).  And each device making up the solution, the Accellerator Nodes and the Storage Nodes are running on servers with memory to facilitate access and improve performance.

Midway through the presentation we toured the test lab at NEC which seemed to get its cooling right out of a wind tunnel.  No the HYDRAStor arrays do not need a wind tunnel for cooling, but it was kinda cool to see it in place.  The lab had four racks full of storage running and was able to hit throughput rates at 10 GB per second.  The speed offered here was definitely amazing.

The NEC Solution was very high end and seemed to me to be greatly suited for archival.  Something used to keep long term copies of your data on with a suplimental storage solution used for every day read/write.

Overall thoughts on Tech Field Day

I had a blast networking with the other delegates and sponsor companies at Tech Field Day Seattle and learned quite alot about these companies and their products.  Coming from an end user role this helped me to see why Storage is so paramount and that there are many ways to skin the storage cat.

I hope the sponsors got the feedback they were looking for and will continue to support Tech Field Day in the future.  As for the solutions, they are all extremely good and accomplish big things.  I think combining some of them, perhaps in a very forward thinking environment or a large environment could be a great all around storage and or backup solution.

I am working further with information learned at Tech Field Day and will be communicating with the sponsor companies to further develop my notes for future blog posts.

Finally I would like to thank Stephen Foskett and others at Gestalt IT for allowing me to be a part of Tech Field Day and the other delegates for helping me learn so much while attending.

Getting all that much closer to Seattle

July 8th, 2010 Comments off

Tech Field Day Seattle is just about here.  There has been some interesting discussion about the things to do in Seattle around the conference that make me wish the plane from Appleton left at a more reasonable time, but the tickets are booked and I am jazzed to be headed out to the event.

I have not decided on  if I will be blogging from the event, but I will be taking lots of notes, and hopefully some awesome content will jump off the page.  Surely the event will see the blog… this blog and a few others, but I do not want to jump the shark with any ideas.

I am interested in the event sponsors and to see what they will bring to the table for sharing, but Im also interested in meeting some new people.  I have a feeling I am going to gain a huge appreciation for all things storage… it has begun already, but I do not get to do it everyday…

See you in Seattle

Off to Tech Field Day

June 10th, 2010 Comments off

Just a few minutes ago I received an official invite to Gestalt IT’s Tech Field Day – Seattle 2010.  I cannot wait.  I thought I would share a bit about the event and what the idea is here ahead of time and maybe some blog posts during (or just after) the event (July 14-17 2010).

What is this “Tech Field Day“?

Tech Field Day is an event put on by Gestalt IT to bring together technical minds from all over the place for discussion with a select group of organizations and each other.  It is not a press event, other than the blogging, vlogging, tweeting, etc done by attendees.

The goal is to learn about new and exciting technologies and network with other individuals/meet new people.

Sounds like a conference to me…

In many respects it is a conference, there are likely to be T-shirts, keynote speeches, breakout sessions, bags of things to cart around and lanyards galore, but the nature of the event, invite only, makes it truly unique.

Disclosure: I have been selected as a delegate to attend Tech Field Day Seattle 2010.  The conference is all expenses paid (meals, airfare, and lodging) and may result in some sweet swag.  I will be blogging about the event and hopefully am able to provide great information about the goings on and all that surrounds this conference.

Now that the business of disclosure is out of the way, I really am glad to have been chosen to attend.  I look forward to learning about great new technologies or even better ways to use existing technologies from organizations and other delegates.

Storage and Virtualization are things that have been top of mind for me lately and I look forward to discussing them with other attendees so that I can not only provide better information to you, the readers of this blog, but also so I can help the technical community at large with a different way of looking at a certain technology.

Thanks Gestalt IT for the selection as a delegate to Tech Field Day Seattle – see you in July.

Categories: Technet Tags: ,